Dingo the Dissident

THE BLOG OF DISQUIET : Qweir Notions, an uncommonplace-book from the Armpit of Diogenes, binge-thinker jottings since 2008 .

Wednesday, 29 September 2021

Negative bias.

Once we could be ruly, couth, pecunious
mayed, ept, gruntled and so on,
but now we can only be their opposites.


1 comment:

Wofl said...


This blog was written in jest. In fact, following :

Once we could indeed have been ruly or pecunious (although I'm not sure I would want to have been ruly) https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=ruly
https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=pecunious

'Couth' was indeed a word. But it didn't mean the opposite of 'uncouth' (or anything like) and was replaced by 'could'. As the antonym of uncouth it is a back-formation of 1896:
https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=couth

On the other hand 'couthie' in Scots means 'kindly', 'comfortable' or 'snug'.

Ept and gruntled are both back-formations coined in 1938:
https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=ept
https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=gruntled

While 'dismayed' was never an antonym of 'mayed' as the 'dis-' is an intensifier https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=dismayed

'Clement', however is a proper word, used, like 'inclement', to describe weather. Though curiously 'now is used only in negation and only of the weather.' It is of course a proper name, notably of several popes.

https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=clement

That link also sheds light on the naming of clementines.